Violin drawing
|
The design for this violin will not be based on any particular historical
instrument, but the dimensions and proportions will be well within the range of those
found in the various models of Stradivari, Guarneri, and the other great classical
makers of the "Golden Age" of violin making that flourished in Cremona, Italy in the
17th and early 18th centuries. It was there that the violin evolved into its modern
form, and with the notable exception of the setup of the neck, (and a corresponding
alteration to the bridge and bass bar), it has remained much the same to the present
day. There has been much interest and speculation concerning the significance of the
geometric proportions to the early developement of the violin's design, and it is
probable that at least some makers of the time were concerned with designing within a
unifying scheme of geometric relationships. For a brief discussion of this tradition,
see the essay on my website:
Fiddletree.com/On the Pythagorean tradition
Before the devolopement of the modern science of acoustics a century or so later,
it may have been that some early makers believed that a harmony of simple proportions
in the outer form of the violin might be conducive to the harmony of its inner voice.
But though this simple relationship may not be born out by our present knowledge of
acoustical physics, it may be meaningful in other ways. The violin is more than just a
voice -- it is a whole work of art, and its visual and tactile qualities as well as
the history and ideas embodied in it are not without significance.
Based on the simple elements of the line and circle, the violin's proportions are
generated within a system of simple relationships to provide a visually unified and
harmonious form. Below is a design I worked out several years ago, and is the one that
I will use for this violin.
|
maple billets
|
If the layout of the design represents the rational, conceptual, and intentional
aspect of violin making, then the material, the wood itself, presents us with the
irrational, unknown, and 'given' side of it. Every tree is unique, and even within a
given species, there can be large variations in appearance, density and stiffness, and
tonal qualities, and these are the reflection of its life in the forest, its ancestry,
climatic cycles, and the soil from which it grew. A large part of the art of violin
making is the exploration of the materials used, and with experience one hopes to gain
some insight into the ever mysterious qualities of the wood in relation to ones
designs, methods of working, and tonal objectives.
Certainly the choice of wood is an important decision in the planning of the
instrument. It's not always as simple as deciding between 'good' and 'bad' wood, but a
subtler choice of what kind of sound the maker is looking for. Although some
compensation can be made for different kinds of wood to try to attain a certain
quality of voice, a better approach is to choose an appropriate wood, get to know it,
and try to maximize its natural characteristics For example, a piece of hard sugar
maple may tend toward a clear, bright sound, but tending toward brittle when
exaggerated. A soft red maple may tend toward a more woody and darker sound, but if
one is not careful, may tend toward mushy when taken to the extreme.
For this violin, I have chosen a piece of red maple from a log that I got from a
local sawmill about 12 years ago. It is beautifully figured, fairly light and soft,
and has proven itself in a number of instruments over the years. Here is a picture of
the wood when I first brought it home and cut it up in the yard in front of my workshop.
|